
- Blog
Learn how combining real-time data, AI forecasting and cross-functional inventory orchestration improves demand accuracy and supply chain agility at global scale.
Forecasting isn’t what it used to be. Today, supply chains face real-time demand swings, retail penalties for stockouts and rising expectations for speed and accuracy.
And yet, Procter & Gamble, managing one of the largest consumer goods portfolios in the world, continues to deliver with remarkable precision.
How?
By turning forecasting from a static function into an adaptive, data-powered rhythm across systems and teams.
This blog unpacks the architecture behind P&G’s demand sensing and inventory strategy and what supply chain leaders can borrow from it.
Legacy forecasting models rely on slow-moving, historical data. But in today’s market:
For a company like P&G that manages thousands of SKUs across 180+ countries, forecasting must be both fast and accurate. Anything less means excess inventory, missed revenue or eroded customer trust.
One of the biggest gaps in most demand forecasting discussions is the role of data latency, how fast demand signals are collected, shared and actioned across functions.
P&G addresses this with a multi-layered demand sensing model that includes:
1. Retail data in near real-time
P&G pulls shelf-level POS data directly from retail partners to monitor actual consumption, not just shipments. This allows demand signals to update hourly, not just weekly.
“The ability to sense consumption and replenish with speed is a core differentiator for us.”
2. AI forecasting with external context
Their models ingest more than internal sales. P&G’s forecasting engines adapt to variables like:
This turns static forecasts into dynamic, self-correcting systems.
3. Integrated inventory planning across teams
Supply chain, sales and manufacturing teams work from a unified visibility layer. This allows rapid reallocation of inventory when regional spikes occur, within hours and not days.
It’s more than just "better data". It’s better co-ordination.
The outcome for P&G’s system isn’t just predictive accuracy, it’s real-time adaptability that leads to:
According to recent earnings calls, P&G’s investment in predictive analytics has contributed to a 2 – 4% improvement in forecast accuracy year over year, even during macro-economic uncertainty.
Many companies invest in AI, but still miss the mark because:
1. Data is only useful if it’s in real-time:
Daily buying habits require daily signals. Weekly cycles are already outdated. Invest in retail data integration that reduces latency. If you’re forecasting weekly but consumers are buying daily, you’re already behind.
2. Lean into connected systems, not just smart ones
It’s not enough to have AI. Your OMS, WMS, and TMS need to integrate forecasting outputs directly into fulfillment workflows. Fragmented tech stacks = fragmented forecasts.
3. Forecasting is not planning:
Forecasting is not planning: The best forecast is useless without the infrastructure to act. Even with perfect predictions, without a flexible OMS to act on those signals, your response will lag. P&G’s orchestration model proves that modular execution systems, from micro-fulfillment to dynamic sourcing are the bridge between sensing and action.
Modular execution systems, like micro-fulfillment, automated sourcing and dynamic routing close the loop between prediction and response.
P&G’s success isn’t just about better algorithms. It’s about aligning sensing, planning and execution into a single operating rhythm.
If you’re forecasting without visibility or sensing demand without acting on it, the gap is already costing you. As supply chains face increasing disruption, it won’t be the biggest players that win. It will be the ones that move fastest.
image copyright: https://internetretailing.net/company-spotlight-procter-gamble/